An independent analysis of 5,426 gambling license records across 16 jurisdictions, based on data aggregated from official regulator registers.
Executive Summary
This report preserves an April 2026 view of 5,426 records aggregated across 16 source lists. The figures are historical and remain under source review; they must not be used as current registry totals or as a comparative rating of jurisdictions.
The data reveals several key patterns: the UK Gambling Commission remains the single largest licensing authority with 2,662 active records, while offshore jurisdictions collectively account for over 2,100 licenses — with Anjouan alone issuing 1,278. Meanwhile, the EU continues to expand its regulated market footprint, with Romania being the latest addition to our tracked jurisdictions.
Methodology
The original report drew on public regulator registers and licensing databases. Its record-level verification and completeness claims are being re-audited against the current release methodology. Editorial jurisdiction ratings have been removed because they were not a sourced regulator field.
This report does not constitute legal advice, endorsement, or recommendation of any operator or jurisdiction. License status reflects the most recent data available from each regulator's public register as of April 2026.
The Numbers: 5,426 License Records Across 16 Jurisdictions
Distribution by Jurisdiction
| Jurisdiction | Regulator | Historical records |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | UK Gambling Commission | 2,662 |
| Anjouan | Anjouan Licensing Services | 1,278 |
| Curaçao | Curaçao Gaming Authority | 654 |
| Malta | Malta Gaming Authority | 311 |
| Tobique | Tobique Gaming Commission | 156 |
| Kahnawake | Kahnawake Gaming Commission | 62 |
| Isle of Man | Gambling Supervision Commission | 59 |
| Gibraltar | Gibraltar Gambling Commissioner | 56 |
| Estonia | Estonian Tax and Customs Board | 50 |
| Denmark | Spillemyndigheden | 48 |
| Romania | ONJN | 29 |
| Alderney | AGCC | 22 |
| Jersey | Jersey Gambling Commission | 15 |
| Mwali (Mohéli) | MISA | 13 |
| Nevis | Nevis Online Gaming Authority | 7 |
| Antigua & Barbuda | FSRC | 4 |
Editorial classifications removed
The earlier edition grouped jurisdictions into an unsourced rating system. That table has been removed. Compare jurisdictions using cited rules, public-register coverage, status semantics, complaint routes and dated enforcement evidence instead of a single editorial label.
Key Findings
1. The UK Dominates — But Faces Saturation
The UK Gambling Commission accounts for 49% of all tracked records (2,662 out of 5,426). This reflects both the maturity of the UK market and the Commission's comprehensive public register, which includes not only remote gambling operators but also land-based casinos, betting shops, gaming machine suppliers, and software providers.
The UK's licensing framework requires operators to meet stringent anti-money laundering (AML), responsible gambling, and consumer protection standards. The UKGC's public register is one of the most transparent in the world, listing operator names, license numbers, license types, and current status.
2. Anjouan's Explosive Growth Raises Questions
Anjouan (part of the Comoros Islands) has emerged as the second-largest licensing jurisdiction in our dataset with 1,278 records — more than Malta, Gibraltar, and the Isle of Man combined. This rapid growth, concentrated in a jurisdiction with limited regulatory infrastructure and enforcement capacity, raises significant questions about the quality and reliability of these licenses.
The previous edition assigned Anjouan an editorial rating. That unsupported label has been removed pending a claim-level review of the official framework, public records, player-protection rules and dated enforcement material.
3. Curaçao's Transition to the New Framework
Curaçao was undergoing a regulatory transition in the April 2026 source snapshot used for this report. That historical snapshot contained 654 Curaçao records attributed to the source available at the time, including legacy and newer-framework entries. The count has not completed the current claim-level review and is not presented as today's register total.
The transition has created uncertainty for operators and players alike, as the timeline for full migration remains fluid. Operators holding legacy sub-licenses are expected to apply for new licenses under the CGA framework.
4. EU Regulated Markets Continue to Expand
The European Union's approach to gambling regulation remains jurisdiction-specific. Each national regime must be described from its own laws, register and enforcement record rather than from a shared editorial category.
Romania's ONJN (Oficiul Național pentru Jocuri de Noroc) maintains a transparent register of 29 Class I licensed operators, covering online gambling, sports betting, and poker. The Romanian market is notable for its relatively high tax rates and strict technical standards, but also for the quality of its public register data.
Other EU jurisdictions in our dataset include Denmark (Spillemyndigheden, 48 licenses), Estonia (EMTA, 50 licenses), and Malta (MGA, 311 licenses). Each maintains a public register and enforces compliance standards aligned with EU directives on anti-money laundering and consumer protection.
5. The Crown Dependencies: Small but Significant
The Crown Dependencies — Jersey, Isle of Man and Alderney — and the British Overseas Territory of Gibraltar collectively accounted for 152 records in this historical snapshot. The earlier edition applied a broad reputation label that is not retained; each framework should be assessed using its own official rules and register.
Gibraltar (56 records) and the Isle of Man (59 records) are particularly notable for hosting some of the world's largest gambling operators, including major publicly listed companies. Alderney (22 records) and Jersey (15 records) maintain smaller but equally rigorous licensing frameworks.
License Types: 43 Categories Across 5 Groups
Our dataset classifies licenses into 43 distinct types, organized into 5 categories:
| Category | Example Types | Approx. Records |
|---|---|---|
| Online Gambling | Casino, Remote Gambling Operator, eGambling | ~2,600 |
| Sports Betting | Betting, Bookmaker, Sports Betting (Toto) | ~800 |
| B2B & Platform Providers | Software Supplier, Platform Provider, B2B | ~700 |
| Land-Based Gaming | Land-Based Casino, Gaming Machine, Ship Casino | ~750 |
| Lottery & Other | Lottery, Promotional Prize Lottery, Games of Skill | ~550 |
The B2B segment is particularly noteworthy. Platform providers, software suppliers, and hosting companies form the backbone of the online gambling industry. Many operators rely on licensed B2B providers for their gaming content, payment processing, and platform infrastructure. A B2B license from a reputable jurisdiction (such as Malta's B2B license or the UK's Software Supply license) is increasingly seen as a prerequisite for doing business with regulated operators.
Watch Jurisdictions: 6 Under Monitoring
In addition to the 16 jurisdictions with active license data, we monitor 6 jurisdictions that issue gambling licenses but where public register data is limited, unreliable, or not independently verifiable:
| Jurisdiction | Status | Reason |
|---|---|---|
| Panama | Watch | No public register; licenses issued but verification difficult |
| Costa Rica | Watch | No formal licensing; operates under data processing zone model |
| Seychelles | Watch | Limited public register; growing number of operators |
| Vanuatu | Watch | New licensing framework; limited track record |
| Belize | Watch | Limited regulatory infrastructure; minimal public data |
| Philippines | Watch | PAGCOR licenses exist but full public register access is restricted |
These jurisdictions are not included in our main dataset because we cannot independently verify individual license records against an official public register.
What This Means for Players, Operators, and the Industry
For players: The issuing authority matters, but protection should be checked fact by fact: current status, approved domain and activity, complaint route, player-funds rules and dated enforcement notices. A jurisdiction label alone does not establish those protections for a specific operator.
For operators: The licensing landscape is becoming more complex, not simpler. The trend toward national regulation in the EU means operators need multiple licenses to serve multiple markets. At the same time, the reputational cost of holding only offshore licenses is increasing, as payment processors, affiliate networks, and advertising platforms increasingly require licenses from recognized jurisdictions.
For the industry: Differences between national and territorial frameworks create compliance challenges, but this historical dataset does not itself measure regulatory quality. Comparative conclusions require cited rules and enforcement evidence.
About This Report
This report is published by Gambling License Registry (gamblinglicenseregister.com), an independent informational directory that aggregates public gambling license data from official regulator registers. We do not issue, endorse, or verify gambling licenses. All data is sourced from publicly available regulator registers and is provided for informational purposes only.
Data sources: UK Gambling Commission, Malta Gaming Authority, Curaçao Gaming Authority, Gibraltar Gambling Commissioner, Isle of Man Gambling Supervision Commission, Alderney Gambling Control Commission, Spillemyndigheden (Denmark), Estonian Tax and Customs Board, Jersey Gambling Commission, Kahnawake Gaming Commission, Tobique Gaming Commission, Anjouan Licensing Services, Nevis Online Gaming Authority, FSRC (Antigua), MISA (Mwali), ONJN (Romania).
Historical snapshot date: April 2026. Source review remains in progress.
License: This report may be cited and linked to with attribution. Please link to the original at gamblinglicenseregister.com/guides/state-of-gambling-licenses-2026.
Disclaimer: This report is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal, financial, or regulatory advice. License status and regulatory frameworks change frequently. Always verify current license status directly with the relevant regulator.